BAP Covers Ukraine, the European Right & Freedom

Submitted by BronzeAgePervert

When I look at this terrible brother war, and the way not only Russians and Ukrainians are fighting, but also, in a kind of online parody of the real carnage, the various factions of the right among themselves, I can only think of the cheering in the coomer lactation rooms at Langley; I can think of a trannie apparatchik cackling to himself in Virginia or the other schizo Claire Danes type trannies at NATO “cyber campaigns” quarters in Europe. Maybe I can think of their masters among the families and organizations that have treated Ukraine like a trafficked sixteen year old cargo container kidnapee from Mariupol, whored out by goldchain Sabra pimps to Qatari scatologists. I can think of the hidden worm rulers of the west, at once desperate that one of their main bases of operations and plunder is endangered; but also so relieved that in this outburst of hysteria they’ve managed to unite much of popular sentiment in a way they were unable during the WuhanGRIDS and St. Floyd fakeries. In relieved flatulence, they thank Moloch for having deflected popular attention from their crimes and given them this temporary cure. Sometimes I imagine Zelensky and the rest of the handpicked performing entertainment industry clowns of the Ukrainian “government,” installed by pantsuits and yentas in the American security state, at their Hollywood-constructed set in Lvov or Krakow, enjoying lobster risotto, and heroically calling, in front of green screens of Kiev, upon sixteen year olds from Kharkov to run under the tires of Russian tanks.

If some of you are animated by images of Russian soldiers and tanks raping and pillaging Europa seventy years ago, that’s OK, this kind of antipathy is legitimate; maybe some of you even remember 1956 or 1968. We are animated by images also, but at least we believe ours to be taking place now. Do any of you think this war would have happened without American, NATO and EU promises to Ukraine? But unlike you, we know those promises are empty. Ukraine can’t win against Russia, and your cheering on this war from safety, Zelensky’s knightly risking of the lives of others who are not even his people or nation, for his own profit and image; trannies in DC pushing Ukrainian civilians and grandmothers to engage Russian tanks and get massacred for maximum outrage PR—we find all this to be unspeakably loathsome. We would take this position even if we thought the Ukrainian cause was more just than Russia’s. Many of you talk about honor, defense of homeland and many such things, and I’ll take you at your word that you believe it. But there is no war of honor here, or any war at all. The Ukrainian “army” is hardly engaging the enemy even: the strategy is that of the “white helmets” of Syria, of the Palestinians of Gaza, of the fraud of Srebernica, or of the Holocaust industry in the West; the maximum display of civilian casualties, real or fabricated, for purposes of demonizing a political enemy. It’s Saddam cannibal soldiers eating babies in incubators again, or torching “a maternity ward” out of Hunnish sadism. I can’t reach people wound up by that sexualized hysteria, but I hope to reach some of you who have preserved some level of skepticism and aren’t hyperemotional spiritual femaels.

The two main problems on which I see I differ from many European rightists on the Russia question are: do you in fact have sovereignty right now? And who is your real and greater enemy, Russia or NATO?

Many of you MAMZERS are not serious. You either see the gang that has hijacked the American government for the last few decades—and by extension NATO and the occupation governments of west and now east Europe—you either see them as your mortal enemy or you don’t. Population replacement in the Anglo-American sphere, both in Europe and interesting enough even in South Korea, this is all the reason you need, but it’s not the only reason. German youth are now a minority in their own nation. Without extreme action—secession, breaking up the nation, expulsion of foreigners that will have to be forcible—Germany as well as other European nations face imminent extinction. Extinction actually won’t happen, but what will happen is a Europe-wide Bosnia party. That is inevitable, and many of you want to roleplay as if it’s 1950 or 1930. But it’s 1989 and time is short.

All efforts have to go to reverse the rule of this cabal over Europe and to prepare for the time of their overthrow and for the reclamation of European lands that you’ve already lost. You are not citizens, you’re strangers and slaves in your own homes. Any attention focused on supposed outside enemies, whether Russia or even Chyna (which you all know me to hate), all of this means you’re not serious.

Putin has a long record of getting the cabal mad because he has a decent record of successfully opposing them. He stopped them from deposing Assad in Syria—and thereby saved a million to 1.5 million Christians (when American actions in Middle East have otherwise destroyed its Christian communities). He stopped American plans also in Georgia. Chyna has no similar record and no strategic tradition or vision, which is why it’s not interesting as a possible ally (it’s not even clear there’s any circumstance in which Chyna would see itself as profiting from an alliance with western nationalists). More important, Putin has a long record of stopping the cabal and its agents in Russia itself. Russia was in the process of being totally taken apart in the 1990’s—the Morgenthau plan of deindustrialization, mass national poisoning, national decline, which the cabal is currently putting into action in the United States itself (opiates in America’s case, whereas it was alcohol for Russia in the 90’s)…but again Putler has been through this and is the only one world leader to have successfully stopped it. This is why he’s interesting as a proven model to oppose our enemies. My like for Putler is neither “ideological” nor “geopolitical” but “historical and circumstantial”—faced with this particular enemy at this time, he’s the only one to have saved his nation from our mutual foe and also to have stood up to them successfully abroad.

The counterargument that Russia, if it succeeded in opposing ZOG (zombi occupied governments) in Europe, would also flood you with migrants is not true and not applicable. Russia doesn’t have the ability to take over west Europe, nor the interest or desire. I see people who have no rule over themselves now, who are playthings of the American security state, worry about a supposed Russian conquest of Europe that didn’t even take place at the height of Soviet power. There won’t be any Russian advance on Paris, but the American embassy in Paris is right now working with the owned French political class to flood that nation with Africans and Muslims. That’s not a supposition, it’s in black and white in Wikileaks and other documents, and is known to be the case by anyone who has been targeted by American (really, cabal, as Americans also are not in charge of their government) interests in west Europe. Worrying about Russian occupation that can’t and won’t happen is a way to protect your enemy.

Even if full Russian occupation did happen, let’s take this strange thought experiment; but even if it did, its ruling model has nothing to do with population replacement in vassal states. Arguments about internal population movements within Stalin’s Russia from 70-80 years ago are irrelevant—the comparison in that case would be to the United States proper, and it wouldn’t be flattering for the western side. Two things can plainly show you that no, Russia in fact wouldn’t engage in population replacement in West or East Europe, a historical observation and a now one. The indisputable fact is that Russia in fact didn’t change the population of its Warsaw Pact vassals even at the height of its power, but America did change the population of its NATO clients. The even more indisputable and urgent fact is that this is right now the continued policy of America: it puts pressure today, not sixty years ago, on even Hungary and others, to open their borders. Russia doesn’t have this policy of its own client states (you could maybe consider Armenia or Transnistria or Belarus). The reason is simple: Russia doesn’t have either the open borders ideology of America, nor is its economy arranged to make use of cheap Third World labor in its client states (again it is important to distinguish between what goes on within Russia proper versus how it treats its clients, just as it’s important to distinguish between what goes on within America proper versus what happens to its own dependents; absorption into either Russia or America isn’t on the table here). Absent further evidence there’s no reason to believe that even full Russian patronage over Western Europe would continue the policy of population replacement America has imposed. That said, this is irrelevant to begin with, because the plausible prospect is Russian humiliation of NATO-GAE and its subsequent dissolution, not Russian rule or even indirect dominance over Europe itself. Someone is offering to humiliate your oppressor, but this is someone who doesn’t have the ability to rule over you: it sound good. Why you would consider the bizarre prospect of direct Russian domination?

Then again, what is your plan as a European rightist? If you’re not arranging your life now to anticipate a Bosnia-type condition over the whole of Europe in 5-15 years time, you’re not serious. If you plan to put up a resistance at all to your countries, women and property being taken from you by the cabal in charge of America, Europe will necessarily resemble Yugoslavia in the early 1990’s or Argentina in the early 1970’s or a combination of these. You must ask yourselves, who will your ally be? Where will you get weapons, logistics and training for the coming time? Where will you get funding? I’m not sure Putler or Russia will help, but they’re the only plausible ally I can think of for the coming years. If you want to reject Russia over supposed “ancestral enmity,” what then is your plan? Are you planning to Rock the Voot? Russia has shown it is willing to help the European right, it did for Le Pen. Why antagonize your only plausible ally? By contrast America sided with Muslims in the Bosnia conflict, Muslims in Kosovo, Muslims in Chechnya (many of you kvetch about Chechens fighting for Moscow, but Chechens also fight for Ukraine’s occupied government, and the actual Chechens who carried out attaqs in Russia were given safe harbor in NATO countries), Muslims in Burma against Buddhists, Muslim radicals in Iraq, Syria and Libya against secular Arab governments, Muslim organizations and “refugees” in Europe, and so on. It is without a doubt where America will stand when Europe takes fire in a few years. Russia at least tried to protect Christians in Syria, Armenia, Serbia, and so on.

Russia’s and Putler’s opposition to GAE-NATO now, and possible allyship to you in the future, is motivated by their own interests. But so? The other argument many of you make, regarding Russia’s internal condition or problems—their own Muslim population, the abortion rates, the venereal diseases or drug use—is of no concern to us. The question isn’t about being absorbed into Russia proper. Russia’s humiliation of your current occupiers or their possible help in the future doesn’t transfer their abortion rates to you. Why this needs to be said? In this connection, there are no such things as “ancestral enemies” and permanent enemies in politics. France made alliance with Ottomans; America Scots-Irish with an ancestral hatred of the Norman British, and who had just shot at each other in 1812, then quickly made friends because of common business and other interests. Soviets and Nazees joined for Ribbentrop MOLOTOV pact. Who cares? I would take help from Saudi Arabia or Chyna if I thought they were interested or at all effective in opposing GAE. But they have a track record of not being either, and in fact they seem to be frenemy nodes of GAE. But nothing is permanent and we can always reassess later.

If you are Swedish, Finnish, Polish and such, and have an ancestral antipathy of Russia, what evidence do you have that Russia has any ability or intention to do you harm right now? You have historical examples, but can’t point to a single thing that Russians have done bad to you in your lifetime. Putin’s intention seems to be the protection of Russians in states of former Soviet Union—really of the ancestral Russian Empire. Judging Russia by ancestral antipathy and emotionalism is a vision of politics, life and history that you have maybe without knowing absorbed from America’s victim-based post-Nuremberg moralism, and which is itself the special kvetching heritage of another ethnic group you claim to have contempt for. But it’s ahistorical. Your European ancestors lived alongside that Russian Empire; they made alliances with them at various times. They didn’t see them as this ogrish caricature. I think this is a legitimate Russian aim, to protect Russians in the territories of the Russian Empire, and I believe that those countries are fake, but even if you don’t agree with me, what are his aims to you? They don’t concern Europe proper at all.

You talk about “defense of homeland,” but you are under occupation right now. What are you doing, what have you done to defend your homeland from invasion by your own government? And why are you letting this government, who seeks to snuff you out in your own country, rally you to support it because of a theoretical foreign threat that will never come? I suppose the talk of defense of homeland would be more believable if you owned your homeland right now or made any efforts to reclaim it, but you don’t. Some time ago a kind of nuclear weapon went off in the western world, maybe the whole world, a kind of social-political nuclear weapon that severed the ruling state completely from the nation. We live in states ruled by usurpers now, and the sickness they are imposing on the nations is terminal until they are removed. I would say something like “You see chrysalid-type insectoid thing come into your house, disrupt and inhabit father’s body as zombi; proceeds to pimp out your sister, try to castrate you; your mother in & out of loonyhouse with BPD; then you hear some confused rightist ask ‘Why are you disloyal to FAMILY!’” This is my position and why I think you’re a sucker if you let yourself be mobilized by such a “father” and such a “national family” against “the evil neighbor” who has in fact no ability to oppress you.

It’s because these states and nations as they exist now are usurped, and maybe some of you not see this yet…maybe this is why there is some disagreement among rightists…and I’m assuming now that all this is in good faith. If you saw your subjection clearly you’d see also how absurd is this war-fervor against “ancestral Russian Oriental horde danger.” Your submission right now is total and complete: foreigners are in your streets, taking your wealth, free to physically molest you, courtesy of your own governments. If you’re Swedish maybe Malmo isn’t quite Detroit, but it’s a city you lost to occupation—occupation by your own usurper government. You look at American cities like Detroit or such, and they look as bad as result of any Russian artillery assault on Kharkov. I know what Lyons is like. If you have honor, you’ve had to physically fight in Lyons simply for walking the streets, often daily. This is what life in an occupied city is like. Maybe if you’re Swedish or Finnish the prospects of even a pragmatic alliance with Russia in the future is too much for you. But consider then neutrality, and that breaking this neutrality, revving yourself up with war hysteria against the only man who could probably stand up against this latrine world order, you are doing the work of false and abusive fathers and governments of usurpers.

Many Euro rightists I see now have an entirely emotional reaction to Putin, but being hyperemotional makes you easy to manipulate. What are your objective, concrete and pragmatic objections to Putin? When you attack me and my friends for supporting him, you accuse us of contrarianism, of ressentiment, or of caring about phantom “culture war issues,” instead of supposedly real things like the imminent Rape of Berlin 2.0. But it’s the latter that is a speculative phantom and an image inspired by emotional hysteria; whereas the reasons for our position are entirely pragmatic, and I’ve given here.

Finally I say, if you’re East European you’ve only temporarily escaped this fate. America continues even now to push your owned elites to allow migrants, and soon they will give in. There is no way they won’t give in eventually, because they are bought off. In some cases like Romania or Slovakia the ruling class is the ex-security service from communist times. They’re not patriots and not your friends, but they use the language of patriotism cynically: operationally they simply switched Soviet patronage for that of the CIA and the Mossad. But you’re still ruled by spooks, only now they’re selling you out faster than they did under the Soviets, because now there’s a world market for your flesh. There is simply no way they won’t give in to pressure to let in migrants, and once they do, you too will be faced with the same choice facing western Europe now: Bosnia, possibly a decades-long Bosnia, or extinction. In some cases they won’t need to import the global South. The gypsy populations of e.g. Slovakia and Romania are much larger than the formal census pretends. American and NATO influence will mean that not only are you not allowed to protect yourself against this problem, but that these people will be in a short time raised up to be your rulers.

You look who America supports right now in Burma, which isn’t even in its sphere: when the Burmese people awakened to defend their homeland, America-Saud, or rather the cabal that rules through this…they jump to demonize any elements of tradition and order seeking to preserve themselves in their homes. They do this in Burma, in Middle East, in Azia. Where defense of homeland then in Europe, and what are its prospects? This is why I write this: you live now under a kind of abject slavery, and until you recognize it…how to free yourselves?

36 Comments Add yours

  1. Cthulhu says:

    This war in Ukraine holds within it the potential of reconciliation of the whole white rice as brothers. The Russians economy is being bought by China right now, and they will need help in the post-American world gaining economic independence, help only other white nations could give them. We need to be able to run our own nations to survive. Russians and Europeans all have a mutual interest at the moment.

    What is more, the Russians just began a pre-emptive war in Ukraine to hold back a country thoroughly run by global Jewry under an ideology Russians see as anathema to their way of life (due to Soviet propaganda). In doing do any wrongdoing the Russians may have perceived the Third Reich of committing in operation Barbarossa have just been committed by themselves under near identical circumstances. Both east and west have just cancelled out any conceivable historical debt between one another over the Great Brother War. The path has been set, we just have to take it together.


  2. Arilando says:

    This is simply a response to some of the points raised:

    If the Ukrainians supposedly aren’t engaging the Russians at all why are the Russians making so slow progress?
    How is the US responsible for the immigration policy of Western European countries?
    How will any Western government being “humiliated” by Russia help change immigration policy in Western countries?

    As to why i oppose Putin, i oppose him because he’s invading a European country and killing its people.


    1. miforest says:

      OH the us would NEVER invade or attack another country . nope , not Iraq ,Syria Somalia, Serbia , Vietnam, Libya ,Afghanistan, panama, Grenada, truth is Arilando, you are emotionally weak and putty in the medias hands.


      1. Arilando says:

        None of those countries are European so i really don’t care much.


    2. Gaia says:

      I would like to know an answer to these as well as these are the first counterpoints that I will be faced with.


    3. The Infant Phenomenon says:

      How do you know that the Russians are making slow progress? What makes you think that?


  3. Ramesses II (King of Kings) says:

    I don’t know why this is hard for people. Russia is smashing in the face of the GAE, once again. How can they not rejoice? Ukrainians volunteered to be the “face”, due to falling for what should have been obvious western psyops. They are learning the lesson in a very painful way and of course I pity them.

    Honestly, you have to wonder about the critical thinking skills of people who didn’t realize Russia was for real after the 2015 Syria intervention. If the right in western countries are akin to the anticommunists in Warsaw Treaty countries, then Russia is their USA.

    Also I would just note that a lot of the appalling post-Soviet alcoholism and abortion stats from Russia have really turned around in recent years. They have essentially normal abortion and alcoholism rates. Russia is basically a normal country that just happens to be so big and powerful that it’s being forced into becoming a nationalist model by GAE.


    1. Francisco says:

      I don’t think “the Ukrainians” agreed to anything in a collective or democratic sense. Their government was overtly usurped by the neocon cabal in 2014, who’ve been waging an all-out war (both figuratively and literally) on the opposition ever since. The actual Ukrainian support for a globöhomö neoliberal government is impossible to discern, but it’s safe to say that it was in the minority before the coup. We’re at a point where the occupied governments and their media are creating their own realities by brute force of saturation, repetition, and censorship, making it impossible to trust a word they say.


    2. Robert says:

      Yes, “russia is smashing in the face of the GAE” as you say, but at what cost? I am desperately searching for reasons to be on bap’s side, but I cannot see how it is okay to kill ukrainian civilians like this, and destroy so many of the beautiful buildings, when they said they would only target military places.


  4. joesuber says:

    The ESG rating of this happening is very good; fossil fuels become precious, white people are killed, while sanctions are imposed by every level, from big tech to big banks to big government. The masters get a scapegoat to carry away thier COVID sins. Illegitimate election is forgotten in a haze of Fox News war fervor. Putin traded queens when he was already missing a rook.

    But let’s say Putin has some positional gain here, and keeps everything to the Dneper. It is fantastical thinking to believe that NATO becomes less than it was. Will anyone but BAPists and Elon Musk draw the right lessons?

    Still instinctively cheering for Putler though.


  5. eonvicotry says:

    This is a dumb comment. Half of the Ukrainians supported the protests that led to the 2014 revolution and the current government was democratically elected. They are fighting for it obviously they support it.


    1. Alex says:

      How do you democratically elect someone after a violent revolution? Especially when said revolution is orchestrated by a super power that corrupts officials and supports violent factions who intimidate and kill opposition.


    2. Dumbo says:

      Stand with freedumbs and democracy 🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️


  6. NC says:

    Its all part of the plan Goyim. 1-lots of goyim die
    2-No planting in the bread basket, 30% wheat, 20% corn and 80% of sunflower oil all gone this year. Let that sink in.
    3-#6 world economy kicked of SWIFT, Chinks, Persians and Dots all to follow suit. = petro $$ will collapse
    4-No fuel, fertilizer for EU or USA from the east. Less food grown hear at home. Never mind heat in OCT2022
    5-Famine is coming fall 2022.



    1. Gaia says:

      What is PaPaaC&KtM?


      1. NC says:

        Purge all Pedophiles at all Costs and Kancel(ill) the Masters


    2. eonvicotry says:

      There was no killing the opposition in Ukraine, it’s not Russia. You live in a fantasy world. There were fair elections. Try to get your head up from out of your ass.


      1. Charlie Chan says:

        The crisis actor comedian literally outlawed opposition parties lol “muh democracy” lmao


      2. Snotslugger88 says:

        Ofcourse he outlawed opposition parties during War. The people who always larped about RWDS and throwing commies out of choppers and now lamenting “democracy” when a government under attack by an outside force that uses covert warfare and terrorists jails the fifth column and defeatists and subversives. The FBI to this day has a security index list of all the people who need to be arrested in times of crisis and with your dumb shitposting you just reserved yourself a place on it.


      3. agentleman says:

        I don’t understand why you would give such glowing confidence in the election is such a horrendously corrupt country. Got any support for that opinion ?


  7. Robert says:

    Can someone please reply to me, I am begging. I agree FULLY with everything bap has said in this article, of course our real enemies are not russia and putin, of course it’s much more real from america, of course, yes, I know, nobody I think would disagree with that, but HOW DO YOU JUSTIFY killing so many innocent ukrainians? I am literally listening to all of his podcasts, reading everything, reading frogs on twitter, but nobody touches on this. I cannot be on the side of russia in this conflict, even though I know russia is not my enemy, simply because I can see how much suffering it has caused ukrainians. How do you justify it? Is it fake, are those false flags? Russians did not actually kill many many civilians?


    1. eonvicotry says:

      This is why many of us on the dissident right who are otherwise sympathetic to BAP do not back on this, especially if we are from Ukraine or other countries bordering Russia that have reason to fear that they may be next. We cannot ignore the obvious reality on the ground.


      1. Charlie Chan says:

        Russia will let you be gay though. What’s your fear?


  8. Svi says:

    Life will, I suppose, make the un-serious serious at some point. The price of things…Is still not even considered. It is a fantasy, but once again, life eventually dispels these things (unless one dies in a dream!) If you are un-serious, perhaps it is comforting to know that you will be *right on time*. You will hear the alarm at the same time as most others. You will not hear it early, you will not be more or less prepared than anyone on average. Instead, you may respond instinctually to whatever happens. You will be in exactly the same boat as all your friends and family. This is what has happened so many times. Pamphlets, essays, and now the virtual versions, do very little to change these things. And maybe this is comforting too: One who is serious still must gamble on ends. Still has a profound lack of knowing. And even they might fail to prepare adequately (example: if events occurred today, then I would be very ill-prepared.) Some will cling to the afterlife as their salvation. Others will acquiesce in the face of that price. But, in my dreams at least, there are enough who are willing. They are not ABLE at first — but then, very few are. Ability comes as it goes. What comes after the Last? What ends the end? And then think: What defines a new beginning, what does the first always do? There will be a need for new blood-lines to be noted, new divisions, for it will be — after all — a new man! What has been forgotten cannot be remembered. But something that *happens* ~ Some will say that Svi is far too optimistic, and yet, I have seen the unfatiguing soul. Those who persist for no reason at all. Currently, these sorts look stupid, mired, trapped. But then one only needs ONE spark to make such creatures shine. I prattle now too long and so goodbye. (One last little tidbit: The COUNTER-MORALISM is really such a silly gambit, so doomed-to-fail, so utterly Judas-tic to the ones who employ it. But such things are un-avoidable it seems!)


  9. JA says:

    To be fair, most gay men support Ukraine


  10. Globtroter says:

    What about the 1 million or 2 millions or 5 millions Ukrainians who fled the war in just 2 weeks and are now in Poland? That’s not population replacement or it’s not the direct result of Putler’s actions but a cunning plan of Soros? BAP’s view may work for Western Europe but Central Europe? Meh. BAP can see through the western media propaganda but having problems seeing through thd Kremlin lies and manipulation.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. wearetoast says:

      Globetrotter. the Ukrainian government is forbidding men to leave . those Ukrainian women will be sent to the refugee centers of Europe, the refugees are 90%+ female. Once there , they will up being the “wives” of the millions of Male African and middleastern refugees already there . the soros plan to provide wives for his footsoldiers in Europe .


  11. Snotslugger says:

    Funny how all these neighbours of russia have these animosities towards its people, what a weird coincidence.

    I am done with this idiotic internet meme garbage bubble. Covid was already too much for these brain fried slaves to handle because they couldn’t even overcome the eternal clerk and push karen back in her place and now it makes up sympathies with a government that bombs white children with multi rocket launchers and brings in muslim bandits and mongols into the slavic core country. Fuck this shit. Fuck these armchair geopolitical clowns and their shitty ideas. I will send in my application today to become a FEMA concentration camp guard to keep idiots like that off the streets.


  12. bronze age russophile says:

    Being Polish myself, It’s hard to sustain my respect to BAP. I always saw him as someone who wants to subvert or reform the western world order from the inside, but here he takes a complete side with a failing Russian state that can’t understand soft power and is a pathetic display of WEAKNESS on world stage and battlefield alike.

    He’s trying to convince that the western world order is the real enemy. But the Russian menace is even worse! Go and see the images from Mariupol, a city with almost a half of ethnic Russian population, is now completely razed and leveled by Russian bombs. If Russians are able to do that to their own people, I can only imagine what would it do to foreign ones.

    Russia is not a threat to Europe? According to a recent poll, “86.6% of Russians support the armed invasion of Russia in other European countries” The three countries that according to the poll will be targeted by Russia are: Poland (75.5%), the Baltic countries, among which Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia (41%), Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary (39.6%). Even if the poll is pozzed, these numbers are too overwhelming to simply ignore.

    Trading NATO for “Russoid Anti-Fascist Coalition” is like trading a toothache for a cancer. No thanks BAP, I’ll live with a toothache and manage it myself.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. eonvicotry says:

    BAP is too wrapped up in his conspiracy theories to care about the East Euros, Finns and Swedes. For all the Westeners more concerned with Globohomo than the Russian menace I say put your money where your mouth is and go live there. But they won’t, not one of them will ever walk the walk. It tells you what they really think.


  14. JW says:

    BAP elaborated on this piece in Episode 103. Excerpted transcript:

    A particular message is being spread about how supposedly supporting Ukraine will help change in Europe toward the Right. I’ve seen this argument made and it’s of interest not only to the European right, if you’re listening to the show, you should know the kinds of things that being said to convince people to cheer on this Ukraine-Russia fight. The argument being made is this will lead to European unity and it will wake up Europe to become strong and manly again. This began in Euro nationalist and rightist circles that quite aside from ideology, simply the fact of having to oppose Russia in a new geopolitical conflict with possible military confrontation, that this alone will reform Europe; it will unify, it will read militarize it, it will awaken its identity. And in this militarization, and mobilization of life, there will be this revitalization, there will be, they believe political revitalization, new sense of unity found, a new sense of purpose that will revolutionize and transform European small EU man, concerned with creature comfort and meek and dependent on Americans and left wing. But now he will be mobilized to become strong again and so forth.

    One thing that few are saying, but which many mean maybe without even knowing is that in a condition of crisis, of hard times you have possibility of military conflict, the droves of humanity has risen to the top of the EU and the modern state because of comfort times; the meek bureaucratic creature. But this will now because of hard time, be replaced by manly and brave and enterprising men of genius because sometimes it can be a history during war and time of crisis. So a famous example, Napoleon. He was a very obscure officer who went AWOL often. If it had not been for the time of crisis, he wouldn’t have been allowed to rise.

    So I just want to tell you, if you’re young, and you have maybe been misled to believe this, it’s all lies, none of this is true. And I say this to somebody who may have read my book and you think that “BAP, I would have thought you most of all would have believed this” but in general such things may be true historically, SOMETIMES, but not in this case. You will not in fact, have mobilization or militarization of a kind in scale your thinking, and it will not lead to revitalization. I’ve been through this before is I believed some of the things the Euro right people believed during the time right after 9-11. In terms of my fundamental views, I’ve always believed very much what I do now, people who’ve known me who have gotten in touch with me recently say, you know, back you’ve been very consistent.
    We’ve known you since 16 or 18 you have the same views but for a while after 9-11 In America, you had some of the same arguments that you see now. Exactly, actually the same argument being advanced, and sometimes they were genuinely believed. Bill Kristol was advancing, if not exactly this line with these words what I’ve just told you, but something very similar about how the new struggle will be a project of national greatness that will transcend the petty, self satisfied world of liberal men.

    Inevitably, the leftist prospers in time of comfort and dissipation, but now a new era will come for the revitalization of national greatness and so forth. These were actually Neo-con arguments. In other words, there are two types of arguments Neo-cons when advancing, they were talking about democratization and the Democracy project, but to other people, they were advancing this kind of argument I just said now, the same type being put forth now by Euro rightist or pro EU cons without knowing it.

    No such revitalization of America took place. It was a false hope. Because there was, first of all, no militarization then and there will not be one now in Europe either. There was no new so-called coming of reason or a revival of intelligent statesmanship or genius supposedly called forth by the new time of crisis. Nothing of that happened. The opposite happened.

    The crisis was used to change in a very immediate sense the operations of government in a way that power got re-channeled and you serve two hands that were actually more reckless, more stupid, but it didn’t lead to an adventure society. It’s solidified instead the rule of the woman. The shrill, the bugman, the hysterical, and meanwhile, tens of thousands of brave American men got maimed. The casualty count is not whatever they claimed (3000 to 5000 dead). Tens of housands of American men got badly maimed, many of them seriously in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, losing a hand, a foot or arm.

    They found do real adventures there but only betrayal. I asked you again to read Sam Finlay’s book “Breakfast with the Dirt Cult.” You all know what happened. America continued and even accelerated its a relentless decline into gynocracy. These types of modern day conflict are not real wars. I’ve called them desultary police actions. They are just used as a pretext for the domestic grab of power by the people who are already there.

    There will not be any turnover to the military or adventurous men, the product of that post-911 fighting generation for the American political class. It created people like Tom Cotton, who is the regime lickspittle. All you got was a moron like Sean Hannity stumping for more Appalachian men to get a leg blown off and so forth. So if you go, is this the same thing that will happen Europe. There will not be any general national awakening, not from this. You will at most get your foot blown up or obliterated by a Russian cruise missile if you take this seriously and go to participate in it.

    You will never see the thanks for it. You will be called a fascist and privileged still and the people who hate you will be enhanced in the power and position and security. This why they are doing it in fact, because their failure for 20 years and now especially with the Wuhan GRID psychosis, it was catching up to them and brought them to the brink. There were huge protests in France and Canada of course, but other big protests in Holland and many places where they were not reported. Much bigger than the astroturf Floyd thing. Real anti-lockdown and anti-establishment protests.

    So now okay, “War with Russia, we are all together.” This saves them. I hope people get over this hysteria soon. They are working against you. But no modern war mongering of this kind. There is no shortcut, do you understand?

    There is no magical transformation process through which by virtue of some economic or social forces, the current condition of Europe will be changed. That’s not how it will happen. The only solution is the removal and replacement of the current ruling elite. You must understand this is the only solution has always been. There is no shortcut. There is no path to that through war with Russia or even China or anyone else external. Unless Russia invaded and deposes your government which it won’t do, so stop being hysterical about it as well. But that would help you if they did that. Because if Russia, let’s say, took over Paris, they will not be able to stay there. They will just get rid of your parasitic foreign governments, but don’t worry that will not happen.

    There is not a based EU. There never will be. There is no process by which the current European Union will turn, as some of you are hoping, into Hitlor New Order or whatever it is. This European Union has been designed against that. It is insulated from democratic pressures. It consists of human apparatchiks who have an understanding of Europe that is borderless internally because it has no peoplehood or unity aside from being another labor pool, another industrial area and you will never convince such people of anything either by designing new theories of identity, nor by argument about migration, not by clapping like a train seal when they attack their external enemies, in the vain hopes that the necessities of conflict or struggle will affect some kind of spiritual vital transformation. It will never ever happen. Only their replacement is your salvation, but as for what comes after that, I will talk about this in a future show.


  15. Peter says:

    It’s worse than BAP describes. The Russian and Chinese governments are just as kosher as the USA’s. These countries compete with one another for influence but not to the extent of rebelling against jewry. After Soros opened the USSR, as he accidentally admits to in a 2012 Davos interview, the new Russian Federation was dominated by oligarchs like the Rottenbergs, jewish billionaires who are close friends to Putin. The same sort of men who ran the bureas and were crimelords in the USSR. There is no meaningful distinction between Russia, the USA, or China in relation to jews: all 3 are shabbos goys. Russia has orchestrated some of the foreign invasion into Europe, especially in its’ neighboring countries like Finland and Sweden. Again, the lie BAP tells, “USA is genociding whites for its’ jewish masters but Russia isn’t like other kosher governments” is a false dichotomy. Both these countries participate in reducing the white population as much as jews believe they may dare without reprisal. Russia funds the useful idiots of the alt-right in the USA, who openly praise Dugin, who in turn blows the ghost of Crowley, a jew who wrote sacrificing the innocent (the more innocent the better) empowers you. To perceive any counter-kosher faction out of this lot is self-delusional wishful thinking. You are projecting the wants of your own heart onto what you perceive at best. Misinforming the innocent to trust in false deliverance at worst.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s